How has the role of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) changed since the end of the cold war?
Q. How has the role of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) changed since the end of the cold war?
Asked by Laura - Sun Jun 7 16:23:48 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Now that the threat of communist invasion is no longer present I think NATO is used more as a defense pact against extremists, etc. and more modern day threats among all the nations. It's future is shaky however.
Answered by Jin K - Sun Jun 7 16:39:36 2009
Q. How has the role of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) changed since the end of the cold war?
Asked by Laura - Sun Jun 7 16:23:48 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Now that the threat of communist invasion is no longer present I think NATO is used more as a defense pact against extremists, etc. and more modern day threats among all the nations. It's future is shaky however.
Answered by Jin K - Sun Jun 7 16:39:36 2009
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the Korean War were examples of?
Q. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the Korean War were examples of 1.attempts to prevent the spread of communist power 2.United States efforts to gain foreign territory 3.the failure of capitalism and free market economies 4.United Nations interference in the internal affairs of member nations
Asked by Brandon - Thu Mar 25 23:26:14 2010 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 1 They all are examples of "Preventing the Spread of the Red Menace"...mainly Communism.
Answered by BOB - Thu Mar 25 23:43:58 2010
Q. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the Korean War were examples of 1.attempts to prevent the spread of communist power 2.United States efforts to gain foreign territory 3.the failure of capitalism and free market economies 4.United Nations interference in the internal affairs of member nations
Asked by Brandon - Thu Mar 25 23:26:14 2010 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 1 They all are examples of "Preventing the Spread of the Red Menace"...mainly Communism.
Answered by BOB - Thu Mar 25 23:43:58 2010
American membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization did all of the following for the country except?
Q. 41.American membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization did all of the following for the country except a)strengthen the containment of the Soviet Union b)help reintegrate Germany into the European family c)reduce our defense expenditures, since we would get help from other countries d)reassure Europeans that the U.S. would not abandon them e)strike a major blow to American isolationists
Asked by Sarah C - Sun Apr 18 11:50:37 2010 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, it DID strengthen the containment of the Soviet Union. Had we not contained it, it would have gotten everything except the U.S. Germany became a large and very important part of NATO, especially after the Berlin airlift that the Iron Curtain The U. S. actually increased out expenditures because we had to arm most of our Allies, or at least subsidize their arming. NATO, by its very purpose showed Europe that the US wouldn't abandon them. "An attack upon one member is the same as an attack upon ALL members". Since we had to go to the defense of other countries, a definite blow against isolationism was made. Therefore: the answer is C, it didn't reduce our defense expenditures.
Answered by no - Sun Apr 18 12:27:38 2010
Q. 41.American membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization did all of the following for the country except a)strengthen the containment of the Soviet Union b)help reintegrate Germany into the European family c)reduce our defense expenditures, since we would get help from other countries d)reassure Europeans that the U.S. would not abandon them e)strike a major blow to American isolationists
Asked by Sarah C - Sun Apr 18 11:50:37 2010 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, it DID strengthen the containment of the Soviet Union. Had we not contained it, it would have gotten everything except the U.S. Germany became a large and very important part of NATO, especially after the Berlin airlift that the Iron Curtain The U. S. actually increased out expenditures because we had to arm most of our Allies, or at least subsidize their arming. NATO, by its very purpose showed Europe that the US wouldn't abandon them. "An attack upon one member is the same as an attack upon ALL members". Since we had to go to the defense of other countries, a definite blow against isolationism was made. Therefore: the answer is C, it didn't reduce our defense expenditures.
Answered by no - Sun Apr 18 12:27:38 2010
What was the constitutional conflict in the United States joining NATO (North Atlantic Treaty organization?
Q. What was problems for U.S to join NATO?
Asked by Parth J - Tue Apr 24 22:55:57 2007 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There was no problem. The US was a founding member of the NATO alliance. And given that it was created to oppose Soviet expansion, which most Americans felt was necessary, there was no real opposition to it.
Answered by Sam N - Tue Apr 24 23:01:22 2007
Q. What was problems for U.S to join NATO?
Asked by Parth J - Tue Apr 24 22:55:57 2007 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. There was no problem. The US was a founding member of the NATO alliance. And given that it was created to oppose Soviet expansion, which most Americans felt was necessary, there was no real opposition to it.
Answered by Sam N - Tue Apr 24 23:01:22 2007
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization was a?
Q. A.military alliance of the recently defeated countries of World War II. B.military alliance consisting of the United States and western European countries. C.military alliance of newly freed African countries. D.military alliance consisting of the USSR and eastern European countries.
Asked by Princess - Fri May 22 17:47:15 2009 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. B. it was a military & economic alliance between us & western european nations to check growth of communism in europe. USSR responded w/ warsaw pact(which is D)
Answered by wtws? - Fri May 22 20:33:50 2009
Q. A.military alliance of the recently defeated countries of World War II. B.military alliance consisting of the United States and western European countries. C.military alliance of newly freed African countries. D.military alliance consisting of the USSR and eastern European countries.
Asked by Princess - Fri May 22 17:47:15 2009 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. B. it was a military & economic alliance between us & western european nations to check growth of communism in europe. USSR responded w/ warsaw pact(which is D)
Answered by wtws? - Fri May 22 20:33:50 2009
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization was created to bind together a quickly crumbling alliance?
Q. true or false?
Asked by Rattiesrule - Wed Jan 3 10:05:42 2007 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. false it was created to counter the warsaw pact
Answered by jefferson - Wed Jan 3 10:09:02 2007
Q. true or false?
Asked by Rattiesrule - Wed Jan 3 10:05:42 2007 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. false it was created to counter the warsaw pact
Answered by jefferson - Wed Jan 3 10:09:02 2007
Is the Atlantic Alliance an other name for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)?
Q. Is the Atlantic Alliance an other name for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)? is it the same thing?
Asked by Janvier - Tue May 6 16:37:47 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It depends. To Americans, it means the relationship between Europe, usually France, and America. Increasingly, to Europeans, it means the European Union. So, NATO could be considered the Atlantic Alliance, I suppose.
Answered by Eli G - Tue May 6 16:46:37 2008
Q. Is the Atlantic Alliance an other name for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)? is it the same thing?
Asked by Janvier - Tue May 6 16:37:47 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. It depends. To Americans, it means the relationship between Europe, usually France, and America. Increasingly, to Europeans, it means the European Union. So, NATO could be considered the Atlantic Alliance, I suppose.
Answered by Eli G - Tue May 6 16:46:37 2008
The north atlantic treaty orginization has its head-quarters in Brussels?
Q. true or false?
Asked by Fdvdfv F - Thu Jan 8 02:07:24 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The NATO headquarters are in Brussels, in the country of Belgium, and the organization constitutes a system of collective defense whereby its member states agree to mutual defense in response to an attack by any external party.
Answered by jamesmason01 - Thu Jan 8 04:33:57 2009
Q. true or false?
Asked by Fdvdfv F - Thu Jan 8 02:07:24 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The NATO headquarters are in Brussels, in the country of Belgium, and the organization constitutes a system of collective defense whereby its member states agree to mutual defense in response to an attack by any external party.
Answered by jamesmason01 - Thu Jan 8 04:33:57 2009
NATO and the North Atlantic Treaty?
Q. is NATO faithfully carrying out the North Atlantic Treaty? If not, are there any articles you know of on the web that explain why?
Asked by heart&soul - Sun Oct 22 15:42:21 2006 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. they are doing their best
Answered by acid tongue - Mon Oct 23 02:32:28 2006
Q. is NATO faithfully carrying out the North Atlantic Treaty? If not, are there any articles you know of on the web that explain why?
Asked by heart&soul - Sun Oct 22 15:42:21 2006 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. they are doing their best
Answered by acid tongue - Mon Oct 23 02:32:28 2006
where is the headquarter of North Atlantic Treaty Organization?
Q. where is the headquarter of North Atlantic Treaty Organization?
Asked by archana - Wed Oct 21 10:42:55 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. NATO headquarters is at Blvd Leopold III. 1110 Brussels, Belgium. You could have web searched and got the answer in less than one minute
Answered by Blue_Fox - Wed Oct 21 11:02:26 2009
Q. where is the headquarter of North Atlantic Treaty Organization?
Asked by archana - Wed Oct 21 10:42:55 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. NATO headquarters is at Blvd Leopold III. 1110 Brussels, Belgium. You could have web searched and got the answer in less than one minute
Answered by Blue_Fox - Wed Oct 21 11:02:26 2009
Which of member countries is a depositor of the North Atlantic Treaty?
Q. Which of member countries is a depositor of the North Atlantic Treaty?
Asked by zaza t - Fri Mar 7 14:01:23 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. Which of member countries is a depositor of the North Atlantic Treaty?
Asked by zaza t - Fri Mar 7 14:01:23 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
I want to ask about NATO(North Atlantic Treaty Organization)?
Q. I 'm wondering what the meaning of the symbol( the star on the circle & the white object on the blue ground) on the NATO 's flag . Can anyone help me ?
Asked by Tra Bui - Mon Nov 3 06:08:10 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, the swastika was busied ;-)))
Answered by k - Mon Nov 3 07:19:57 2008
Q. I 'm wondering what the meaning of the symbol( the star on the circle & the white object on the blue ground) on the NATO 's flag . Can anyone help me ?
Asked by Tra Bui - Mon Nov 3 06:08:10 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, the swastika was busied ;-)))
Answered by k - Mon Nov 3 07:19:57 2008
ABOUT NATO ( North Atlantic Treaty Organization ). PLEASE HELP ME!?
Q. Where did it start? HOW did it start? What was it? HOW did it end? Please help me answer these questions. Thank you.
Asked by flyAZNchick - Mon Apr 7 19:07:32 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 1]it started it brussels, belgium 2] at the end 3]The Treaty of Brussels, signed on 17 March 1948 by Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, France and the United Kingdom is considered the precursor to the NATO agreement. This treaty established a military alliance, later to become the Western European Union. However, American participation was thought necessary in order to counter the military power of the Soviet Union, and therefore talks for a new military alliance began almost immediately. These talks resulted in the North Atlantic Treaty, which was signed in Washington, D.C. on 4 April 1949. It included the five Treaty of Brussels states, as well as the United States, Canada, Portugal, Italy, Norway, Denmark and Iceland. Three years… [cont.]
Answered by Andrew T - Mon Apr 7 19:13:21 2008
Q. Where did it start? HOW did it start? What was it? HOW did it end? Please help me answer these questions. Thank you.
Asked by flyAZNchick - Mon Apr 7 19:07:32 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 1]it started it brussels, belgium 2] at the end 3]The Treaty of Brussels, signed on 17 March 1948 by Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, France and the United Kingdom is considered the precursor to the NATO agreement. This treaty established a military alliance, later to become the Western European Union. However, American participation was thought necessary in order to counter the military power of the Soviet Union, and therefore talks for a new military alliance began almost immediately. These talks resulted in the North Atlantic Treaty, which was signed in Washington, D.C. on 4 April 1949. It included the five Treaty of Brussels states, as well as the United States, Canada, Portugal, Italy, Norway, Denmark and Iceland. Three years… [cont.]
Answered by Andrew T - Mon Apr 7 19:13:21 2008
The Marshall Plan, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and the Truman Doctrine are...?
Q. examples of United States? A) economic policies during the Great Depression B) involvement in Europe after World War 2 C) civil rights efforts during the 1960's D) efforts to put a person on the moon Thank you for your time.
Asked by HELLO! - Thu Dec 28 16:31:31 2006 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. B
Answered by Kriti - Thu Dec 28 17:28:13 2006
Q. examples of United States? A) economic policies during the Great Depression B) involvement in Europe after World War 2 C) civil rights efforts during the 1960's D) efforts to put a person on the moon Thank you for your time.
Asked by HELLO! - Thu Dec 28 16:31:31 2006 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. B
Answered by Kriti - Thu Dec 28 17:28:13 2006
Is the USA mentioned in the End Times as the King of the North?
Q. Part of Daniel chapter 11 mentions the rise of the Anti-christ. Dan 11:40 40"At the end time the king of the South will collide with him, and the king of the North will storm against him with chariots, with horsemen and with many ships; and he will enter countries, overflow them and pass through. This passage clearly talks about 3 factions going to war. South againts the Anti-christ first, and later also the North. The South isn't too much of a big deal, but the north has many ships and vehicles who fights the Anti-christ. Clearly the North is world power enough to stand up against the kingdom of the Anti-christ. The prerequisites of the North is: it has to have a large powerful navy. The US has the worlds largest navy. Also the… [cont.]
Asked by YAadventurer - Mon Sep 17 20:43:51 2007 - - 23 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Who knows... Did you hear how the president is trying to get rid of the borders and make Canada, the US, and Mexico all one regional government? Google "North American Union"
Answered by brian8907, VT - Mon Sep 17 20:48:28 2007
Q. Part of Daniel chapter 11 mentions the rise of the Anti-christ. Dan 11:40 40"At the end time the king of the South will collide with him, and the king of the North will storm against him with chariots, with horsemen and with many ships; and he will enter countries, overflow them and pass through. This passage clearly talks about 3 factions going to war. South againts the Anti-christ first, and later also the North. The South isn't too much of a big deal, but the north has many ships and vehicles who fights the Anti-christ. Clearly the North is world power enough to stand up against the kingdom of the Anti-christ. The prerequisites of the North is: it has to have a large powerful navy. The US has the worlds largest navy. Also the… [cont.]
Asked by YAadventurer - Mon Sep 17 20:43:51 2007 - - 23 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Who knows... Did you hear how the president is trying to get rid of the borders and make Canada, the US, and Mexico all one regional government? Google "North American Union"
Answered by brian8907, VT - Mon Sep 17 20:48:28 2007
What is the definition of a regional security alliance?
Q. Is NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) considered to be a regional security alliance or would the relationship between the United States and Canada be a better example?
Asked by JD Jones - Thu Feb 5 16:07:32 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I consider NATO a regional security alliance.
Answered by Elwood Blues - Thu Feb 5 16:11:35 2009
Q. Is NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) considered to be a regional security alliance or would the relationship between the United States and Canada be a better example?
Asked by JD Jones - Thu Feb 5 16:07:32 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I consider NATO a regional security alliance.
Answered by Elwood Blues - Thu Feb 5 16:11:35 2009
Who created NATO and what does it take to become a member?
Q. What person invented NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) and what do you have to do to become a member? please answer this asap i need it for homework!! thank you!!
Asked by XxJuicyxX - Thu Jan 10 19:03:32 2008 - - 2 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Beginnings The Treaty of Brussels, signed on the 17 March 1948 by Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, France, and the United Kingdom, is considered the precursor to the NATO agreement. This treaty established a military alliance, later to become the Western European Union. However, American participation was thought necessary in order to counter the military power of the Soviet Union, and therefore talks for a new military alliance began almost immediately. These talks resulted in the North Atlantic Treaty, which was signed in Washington, D.C. on 4 April 1949. It included the five Treaty of Brussels states, as well as the United States, Canada, Portugal, Italy, Norway, Denmark and Iceland. Three years later, on 18 February 1952, Greece… [cont.]
Answered by Chris L - Thu Jan 10 19:11:17 2008
Q. What person invented NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) and what do you have to do to become a member? please answer this asap i need it for homework!! thank you!!
Asked by XxJuicyxX - Thu Jan 10 19:03:32 2008 - - 2 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Beginnings The Treaty of Brussels, signed on the 17 March 1948 by Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, France, and the United Kingdom, is considered the precursor to the NATO agreement. This treaty established a military alliance, later to become the Western European Union. However, American participation was thought necessary in order to counter the military power of the Soviet Union, and therefore talks for a new military alliance began almost immediately. These talks resulted in the North Atlantic Treaty, which was signed in Washington, D.C. on 4 April 1949. It included the five Treaty of Brussels states, as well as the United States, Canada, Portugal, Italy, Norway, Denmark and Iceland. Three years later, on 18 February 1952, Greece… [cont.]
Answered by Chris L - Thu Jan 10 19:11:17 2008
Why did NATO Help the British Crown Take the Falkland Islands?
Q. Why did NATO help the British Crown take the Falkland Islands? NATO means (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) so why did the US allow NATO to take the Falkland Islands which is the Americas?! Isn't this a violation of US Foreign Policy. Didn't the USA allow a Eurpean Power to violate the Monroe Doctrine?
Asked by Kaydell - Tue Sep 1 23:03:51 2009 - - 11 Answers - 0 Comments
A. THe MOnroe Doctrine is not a law. As such, it has no enforceability. Major General, US Air Force, David Forgan planned and supported the BRitish Air Efforts. He coordinated supplies and readiness. We were not physically involved, but his direction and guidance played a part in the war. Britain is one of the founding partners of NATO. This is a great example of entangled foreign alliances that Washington warned us of.
Answered by JimH - Tue Sep 1 23:18:23 2009
Q. Why did NATO help the British Crown take the Falkland Islands? NATO means (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) so why did the US allow NATO to take the Falkland Islands which is the Americas?! Isn't this a violation of US Foreign Policy. Didn't the USA allow a Eurpean Power to violate the Monroe Doctrine?
Asked by Kaydell - Tue Sep 1 23:03:51 2009 - - 11 Answers - 0 Comments
A. THe MOnroe Doctrine is not a law. As such, it has no enforceability. Major General, US Air Force, David Forgan planned and supported the BRitish Air Efforts. He coordinated supplies and readiness. We were not physically involved, but his direction and guidance played a part in the war. Britain is one of the founding partners of NATO. This is a great example of entangled foreign alliances that Washington warned us of.
Answered by JimH - Tue Sep 1 23:18:23 2009
Does the Philippines belong to any intergovernmental organizations outside the UN system?
Q. such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) or the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)?
Asked by hsmstam - Mon Feb 16 08:27:22 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. SEATO and I think they are a member of the Pacific Rim Nations.
Answered by Melting Media - Mon Feb 16 08:32:16 2009
Q. such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) or the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)?
Asked by hsmstam - Mon Feb 16 08:27:22 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. SEATO and I think they are a member of the Pacific Rim Nations.
Answered by Melting Media - Mon Feb 16 08:32:16 2009
Should the NATO war machine be dismantled?
Q. Does NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) war machine need to be dismantled. It was set up after WWII to fight America's wars and is certainly more a warmaker rather than a "peacemaker". Its existence will be seen to be a serious threat to world peace and, eventually, unless abolished, will trigger World War III. These so-called military "treaties" are just like gangs and like all gangs they increase rather than reduce the risk of conflict. Do you agree with this proposition?
Asked by celtish - Tue Jan 13 19:54:08 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Nope. NATO is good. You can get rid of the UN though. They are useless.
Answered by daboys12_15 - Tue Jan 13 19:58:19 2009
Q. Does NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) war machine need to be dismantled. It was set up after WWII to fight America's wars and is certainly more a warmaker rather than a "peacemaker". Its existence will be seen to be a serious threat to world peace and, eventually, unless abolished, will trigger World War III. These so-called military "treaties" are just like gangs and like all gangs they increase rather than reduce the risk of conflict. Do you agree with this proposition?
Asked by celtish - Tue Jan 13 19:54:08 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Nope. NATO is good. You can get rid of the UN though. They are useless.
Answered by daboys12_15 - Tue Jan 13 19:58:19 2009
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'north atlantic treaty'
Sat Jul 31 04:59:30 2010 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
favstocks.com
The White House
Wed, 12 May 2010 17:00:15 GM
President Karzai expressed deep appreciation for the vital support of the 46 troop-contributing countries to the . North Atlantic Treaty. Organization's (NATO's) International Security Assistance Force, including ongoing stabilization ...
[Hide]▲
